Enforced Disappearances
in Turkey

Enforced disappearance occurs when a state official — or a person acting on behalf of the state — detains an individual and then denies any knowledge of that person's fate or whereabouts. It is a form of violence directed not only at the person who has been disappeared, but also at those left behind: it places their lives in suspension, and continues for years. In Turkey, this crime became a systematic state practice targeting Kurdish people in the context of the armed conflict that began in 1984 between the Turkish Armed Forces and the PKK.

Facts

What Happened?

Particularly during the 1990s, in provinces under a State of Emergency (OHAL), large numbers of people were taken into custody by state officials — from their homes, their workplaces, or public spaces, in front of witnesses. Their whereabouts were then denied; families were told “we don’t have them” or “they joined the PKK.”

Context

Enforced disappearances in Turkey began with the repression of people linked to armed left-wing organizations following the 1980 coup, became a systematic practice targeting Kurdish people from 1984 onwards, and reached their peak in the 1990s as they became intertwined with state policy. Together with the burning of villages, mass forced displacement, and extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances formed one of the defining — and mutually reinforcing — patterns of violation during this period.

Who was targeted?

Youth leaders, trade unionists, and activists alleged to be linked to armed left-wing organizations; opinion leaders connected to the Kurdish political movement, including executives of the Human Rights Association (İHD), leading figures of the People’s Labour Party (HEP), and staff of the newspaper Özgür Gündem; and a great many ordinary Kurdish citizens living in the State of Emergency region who had no such connections.

Who Is Responsible?

The primary direct perpetrators were JİTEM (the Gendarmerie Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism unit) and the military. But these violations were not isolated acts — they were part of a security strategy built around denying the PKK a foothold in the region. The special warfare structures of the period, the village guard system, and the nexus between the state, organized crime, and political actors created a broad zone of impunity.

Toward a solution Solution

When the truth about the forcibly disappeared is not disclosed, neither mourning nor closure is possible. For this reason, accountability cannot be limited to criminal justice alone; access to truth, recognition of the relatives of the disappeared, and the preservation of collective memory are equally essential.

DATABASE:

Enforced Disappearances in Turkey

This database was established by Hakikat Adalet Hafıza Merkezi (Truth Justice Memory Center) to document all citizens forcibly disappeared in Turkey since the military coup of 12 September 1980; to expose the structure of enforced disappearance as a crime, its patterns, and the mechanisms of impunity; and to record the stories of the disappeared alongside the testimonies of their relatives.

This database was established by Hakikat Adalet Hafıza Merkezi (Truth Justice Memory Center) to document all citizens forcibly disappeared in Turkey since the military coup of 12 September 1980; to expose the structure of enforced disappearance as a crime, its patterns, and the mechanisms of impunity; and to record the stories of the disappeared alongside the testimonies of their relatives.

Unspoken Truth: Enforced Disappearances

This report is based on field research we conducted primarily in the districts of Cizre, İdil, and Silopi in the Şırnak…

Enforced Disappearances and the Conduct of the Judiciary

Holding Up the Photograph: Experiences of the Women Whose Husbands were Forcibly Disappeared

This report is based on our field research that focuses on experiences of the wives of the forcibly disappeared people. Our…